Today jurors in U.S. District Court in Knoxville found Blount County Schools not guilty in a discrimination lawsuit. Plaintiffs had contended school officials were aware that William Blount High School students were racially harassing each other and allowed these actions to continue by not taking proper prevention measures. Officials were specifically accused of violating the students Title VI and 14th Amendment rights.

Share

Print This / Email This

Comments

@FG The headline has been changed to reflect the accepted usage. Thanks for pointing out the inaccuracy.

-- Posted by Timothy Hankins on Fri, Sep 26, 2008, 4:25 pm EDT (Report this)

The Daily Times looks for a crime when there isn't one and often fails to report a crime when there is one.

-- Posted by Daily Crimes on Fri, Sep 26, 2008, 2:01 pm EDT (Report this)

The Daily Crimes or The Daily Times as some call this rag like to scandalize and dramatize. This paper quickly publishes accusations, yet rarely follows up to say that no charges were filed on the accusations reported. This is very poor journalism, but few have expectation of anything better.

-- Posted by Daily Crimes on Fri, Sep 26, 2008, 1:57 pm EDT (Report this)

PLEASE change the headline to:

"Blount County Schools Found Not LIABLE in Discrimination Case"

This was not a criminal case. Terms GUILTY or NOT-GUILTY are used solely with criminal cases.

-- Posted by FG on Fri, Sep 26, 2008, 1:14 pm EDT (Report this)

You must log in and verify your email address before you can post a comment. After registering, Click here to verify your email address.

Login | Register

Blount County Schools found not liable in discrimination case

by Matthew Stewart
of The Daily Times Staff
Originally published: September 26. 2008 12:01PM
Last modified: September 26. 2008 2:53PM

Today jurors in U.S. District Court in Knoxville found Blount County Schools not liable in a discrimination lawsuit.

Plaintiffs had contended school officials were aware that William Blount High School students were racially harassing each other and allowed these actions to continue by not taking proper prevention measures. Officials were specifically accused of violating the students Title VI and 14th Amendment rights.

The first two defense witnesses — Blount County Sheriff’s Office Detective David Henderson and Deputy Joe Crisp — testified Tuesday that an April 6, 2005, lockdown was instituted due to a student’s threat of violence.

This testimony contrasted with the plaintiff’s case, which argued that the lockdown was the result of unresolved racial tension.

Blount County law enforcement officials had also investigated several graffiti incidents at William Blount High School during the 2004-2005 school year, said Crisp. Deputies were ultimately unable, however, to find any witnesses and turn up any leads in these cases, he said.

The plaintiffs testified in federal court Monday and Tuesday. Every witness told jurors they felt Blount County school officials showed a lack of concern in dealing with the school’s alleged hostile racial environment.

During cross-examination, plaintiffs told jurors they had not been denied participation in any school activities because of their race. Two former students — Brittney Cleveland and Vincent Morrison — explained they simply did not try out, because they feared for their own safety.

Plaintiffs also admitted two of the students had been given the option of leaving their classes five minutes early so they would not be subjected to racial slurs and threats of violence.

The two students and their parents testified that they declined this option, because it would draw more attention to the children and possibly make them bigger targets.

The plaintiffs were seeking $1 million in compensatory damages.