Dear Editor:

The idea of bringing solar power to Maryville (1A, Sept. 7) does not benefit Maryville for several reasons.

1. Solar power does not make economic sense on a cost-per-kilowatt basis when compared to current fossil fuel or nuclear power rates. Large-scale solar power plants only exist because of government subsidies — citizen taxes and not economics.

2. The reasoning for looking into solar power is not compelling. Just because the new TVA contract allows Maryville to pull 5% of its energy from renewable resources does not mean a study should be undertaken. It would take about one afternoon to compare what the Tennessee Valley Authority would be charging for power versus what other cities are currently paying for solar power.

3. Solar panel farms are a blight on the landscape. Blount County has scenic drives both in and surrounding its cities. Solar farms would distract from Blount's and Maryville's beauty wherever they were located. Even if solar power was less expensive per kilowatt, is it worth it to to put a blight on the landscape?

With TVA currently being a reliable and economic provider of electricity for Maryville residents, the only major reason to go forward with solar power would be if it would result in significant power bill savings to Maryville residents. Please let economics and the beauty of Blount County be the drivers of the solar power decision.

Scott Houser

Helmsley Court


Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.